4.7 Article

THE INITIATION AND PROPAGATION OF HELIUM DETONATIONS IN WHITE DWARF ENVELOPES

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 797, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/46

Keywords

binaries: close; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; supernovae: general; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. NASA through the Astrophysics Theory Program [NNX15AB16G]
  2. Chandra X-ray Center [PF1-120088]
  3. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  4. National Science Foundation [AST 11-09174]
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1109174] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detonations in helium-rich envelopes surrounding white dwarfs have garnered attention as triggers of faint thermonuclear .Ia supernovae and double detonation Type Ia supernovae. However, recent studies have found that the minimum size of a hotspot that can lead to a helium detonation is comparable to, or even larger than, the white dwarf's pressure scale height, casting doubt on the successful ignition of helium detonations in these systems. In this paper, we examine the previously neglected effects of C/O pollution and a full nuclear reaction network, and we consider hotspots with spatially constant pressure in addition to constant density hotspots. We find that the inclusion of these effects significantly decreases the minimum hotspot size for helium-rich detonation ignition, making detonations far more plausible during turbulent shell convection or during double white dwarf mergers. The increase in burning rate also decreases the minimum shell mass in which a helium detonation can successfully propagate and alters the composition of the shell's burning products. The ashes of these low-mass shells consist primarily of silicon, calcium, and unburned helium and metals and may explain the high-velocity spectral features observed in most Type Ia supernovae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available