4.5 Article

Interface shear behaviours between recycled concrete aggregate and geogrids for pavement applications

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 228-235

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2018.1453609

Keywords

Geogrid; recycled concrete aggregate; interface shear strength; shear strength; gradation

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund underthe TRF Senior Research Scholar program [RTA5980005]
  2. Suranaree University of Technology
  3. Office of Higher EducationCommission under NRU project of Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The usage of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) in pavement applications is a sustainable approach for future infrastructure development, given the significant environmental benefits. Geogrid reinforcement of RCA can also improve the tensile and flexural strengths of the pavement structure to sustain high traffic loadings. The effect of aperture size, tensile strength of geogrids, normal stress and gradation on shear interaction between geogrids and RCA was investigated in this research, with the usage of a large-scale direct shear test (LDST) apparatus. Three types of biaxial geogrids, with different aperture sizes and tensile strengths, and two RCA samples with different gradations were used in this study. The interface shear strength was found to be highly dependent upon the aperture width of the geogrids, D, as well as the RCA particles finer than the aperture width of geogrid, F-D. Based on the analysis of test results, a linear relationship between interface shear strength coefficient, alpha, the ratio of interface shear strength of geogrid/RCA and shear strength of RCA was proposed, with respect to the D/F-D ratio. The proposed relationship will be useful for a rapid assessment of the interface shear strength coefficient of geogrid-reinforced RCA based on the aperture size of geogrids and RCA gradation properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available