4.4 Article

Impact of untreated dental caries on the quality of life of Brazilian children: population-based study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 390-399

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12365

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology
  3. Ministry of Health
  4. State of Maranhao Research and Scientific/Technological Assistance Foundation (FAPEMA) (PPSUS-FAPEMA/CNPq/Ministry of Health) [03386/13, 00713/14, 04137/15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe assessment of oral health should consider clinical and biopsychosocial aspects. AimTo evaluate the impact of untreated dental caries on the quality of life of children. DesignA cross-sectional study was conducted with 647 Brazilian children. The Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ(8-10)) and the oral health' global indicator were administered to the children and used as the outcomes. Parents answered a general questionnaire, and oral clinical examinations were performed. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney test, and Poisson's regression analysis (=5%). The psychometric properties of the CPQ(8-10) were tested for younger age group (6/7years). ResultsUntreated caries was a predictor of impact on quality of life for the following items: pain in teeth/mouth' (PR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.41-2.04), difficulty biting/chewing hard foods' (PR=1.28; 95% CI: 1.05-1.56), difficulty eating what you wanted to eat' (PR=1.61; 95% CI: 1.29-2.02), trouble sleeping' (PR=1.64; 95% CI: 1.27-2.13), missed school' (PR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.24-2.12), trouble doing homework' (PR=1.61; 95% CI: 1.12-2.31), and difficulty paying attention in class' (PR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.96). ConclusionChildren with untreated dental caries feel greater negative impacts on quality of life than children without untreated caries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available