4.5 Review

Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1914

Keywords

neuro; surgery; augmented reality; endoscopy; Google Glass; head-up display; spine; surgery; wearable device

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionSince the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice. MethodsWe used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review. ResultsAcross all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort. ConclusionsDue to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available