4.4 Article

A life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of a beef system in the USA

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 441-455

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-018-1464-6

Keywords

Beef footprints; Beef production emissions; Beef sustainability; Beef value chain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe need to assess the sustainability attributes of the United States beef industry is underscored by its importance to food security locally and globally. A life cycle assessment (LCA) of the US beef value chain was conducted to develop baseline information on the environmental impacts of the industry includ`ing metrics of the cradle-to-farm gate (feed production, cow-calf, and feedlot operations) and post-farm gate (packing, case-ready, retail, restaurant, and consumer) segments.MethodsCattle production (cradle-to-farm gate) data were obtained using the integrated farm system model (IFSM) supported with production data from the Roman L. Hruska US Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC). Primary data for the packing and case-ready phases were obtained from packers that jointly processed nearly 60% of US beef while retail and restaurant primary data represented 8 and 6%, respectively, of each sector. Consumer data were obtained from public databases and literature. The functional unit or consumer benefit (CB) was 1kg of consumed, boneless, edible beef. The relative environmental impacts of processes along the full beef value chain were assessed using a third party validated BASF Corporation Eco-Efficiency Analysis methodology.Results and discussionValue chain LCA results indicated that the feed and cattle production phases were the largest contributors to most environmental impact categories. Impact metrics included water emissions (7005L diluted watereq/CB), cumulative energy demand (1110MJ/CB), and land use (47.4m(2)aeq/CB). Air emissions were acidification potential (726g SO(2)eq/CB), photochemical ozone creation potential (146.5g C(2)H(4)eq/CB), global warming potential (48.4kg CO(2)eq/CB), and ozone depletion potential (1686g CFC(11)eq/CB). The remaining metrics calculated were abiotic depletion potential (10.3mg Ageq/CB), consumptive water use (2558Leq/CB), and solid waste (369g municipal wasteeq/CB). Of the relative points adding up to 1 for each impact category, the feed phase contributed 0.93 to the human toxicity potential.ConclusionsThis LCA is the first of its kind for beef and has been third party verified in accordance with ISO 14040:2006a and 14044:2006b and 14045:2012 standards. An expanded nationwide study of beef cattle production is now being performed with region-specific cattle production data aimed at identifying region-level benchmarks and opportunities for further improvement in US beef sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available