4.7 Article

Acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with intravenous aciclovir in adults: Incidence and risk factors in clinical practice

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 97-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.002

Keywords

Acute kidney injury; Acyclovir-associated nephrotoxicity; Therapeutic drug monitoring; Chronic kidney disease; Dose-toxicity relationship

Funding

  1. British Infection Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study sought to identify the incidence of, and risk factors for, acute kidney injury (AKI) in adults treated with parenteral aciclovir. Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study of prospectively acquired electronic clinical, pharmacy and laboratory data was performed with approval of the Caldicott guardian. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, prior to analysis of baseline patient and treatment-related risk factors. Results: 269 aciclovir treatment episodes were identified in 268 patients. Overall incidence of AKI was 13%. Half of AKI episodes were KDIGO grade 2/3. In univariate analysis, AKI occurred more frequently in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and in patients treated with higher daily doses of aciclovir. There was also a trend to increased age in patients with AKI. In a binomial logistic regression model only CKD and daily dose remained significant independent factors. Conclusions: AKI is an important side effect of parenteral aciclovir, the incidence of which is comparable to established nephrotoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides. Patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease or receiving higher total doses are at greatest risk, reinforcing the clinical importance of appropriate dose adjustment for ideal body weight and baseline renal function. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available