4.4 Article

Thermal shock susceptibility and regrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 168-176

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1347964

Keywords

Heat shock response; non-oncologic applications of hyperthermia; bacterial infection

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [11SDG7600044]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1133297]
  3. National Institute for General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [T32 GM008365]
  4. National Institutes of Health [1 S10 RR025439-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biofilms on implanted medical devices cause thousands of patients each year to undergo multiple surgeries to remove and replace the implant, driving billions of dollars in increased health care costs due to the lack of viable treatment options for in situ biofilm eradication. Remotely activated localised heating is under investigation to mitigate these biofilms; however, little is known about the temperatures required to kill the biofilms. To better understand the required parameters this study investigated the thermal susceptibility of biofilms as a function of their fluidic and chemical environment during growth, as well as their propensity for regrowth following thermal shock. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were cultured in shaker plate fluidic conditions in four different growth media, then thermally shocked at various temperatures and exposure times. Biofilms were re-incubated to determine their regrowth potential following thermal shocks of various intensities. Results indicate that growth media has little impact on thermal susceptibility, while fluidic conditions strongly influence susceptibility to modest thermal shocks. This effect disappears, however, with increasingly aggressive shocks, reducing biofilm populations by up to 5 orders of magnitude. Regrowth studies indicate a critical post-shock bacterial loading (approximate to 10(3)CFU/cm(2)) below which the biofilms were no longer viable, while biofilms above that loading slowly regrew to their previous population density.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available