4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Ni supported on CaO-MgO-Al2O3 as a highly selective and stable catalyst for H2 production via the glycerol steam reforming reaction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 256-273

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.165

Keywords

Glycerol steam reforming; H-2 production; Ni catalysts; CaO-MgO doping; Al2O3 modifiers

Funding

  1. program THALIS
  2. Hellenic Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning and Religious Affairs
  3. European Social Fund
  4. CIBER-BBN (Institute de Salud Carlos III)
  5. European Regional Development Fund
  6. Abu Dhabi Educational Council (ADEC) through the Award for Research Excellence [B3111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study of the GSR performance for Ni/CaO-MgO-Al2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts is reported. Catalysts were synthesized applying the wet impregnation method at a constant metal loading (8 wt %). Synthesized samples were characterized by N-2 adsorption/desorption, ICP, BET, XRD, NH3-TPD, CO2-TPD, H-2-TPR, XPS, TEM, STEM-HAADF and EDS. The carbon deposited on their surface under reaction conditions was characterized by TPO, Raman and TEM. It was proven that the use of CaO-MgO as alumina modifiers leads to smaller nickel species crystallite size, increased basicity and surface amount of Ni-0 phase. Thus, it increases the conversion to gaseous products favoring H-2 and CO2 production to the detriment of CO formation, by enhancing the water gas-shift (WGS) reaction. No liquid products were produced by the Ni/modAl catalyst over 550 degrees C, whereas time on stream results confirmed that deactivation can be prevented, as apart from decreasing the amount of coke deposition the nature of carbon was altered towards less graphitic and more defective structures. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available