4.7 Article

Hydrogen evolution from hydrolysis of ammonia borane catalyzed by Rh/g-C3N4 under mild conditions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 43, Issue 14, Pages 7038-7045

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.148

Keywords

Rhodium; Hydrogen evolution; Ammonia-borane; Catalytic hydrolysis

Funding

  1. Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Foundation [2016JQ0052]
  2. Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry of Sichuan Institutes of Higher Education [LZJ1603]
  3. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Higher Education System [SWWT2015-2]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21777109]
  5. Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department of Sichuan Province [16TD0007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing effective catalysts for hydrogen evolution from hydrolysis of ammonia borane (AB) is of great significance considering the useful applications of hydrogen. Herein, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) prepared through the simply pyrolysis of urea was employed as a support for Rh nanoparticles (NPs) stabilization. The in-situ generated Rh NPs supported on g-C3N4 with an average size of 3.1 nm were investigated as catalysts for hydrogen generation from the hydrolysis of AB under mild conditions. The Rh/g-C3N4 catalyst exhibits a high turnover frequency of 969 mol H-2 center dot (min.mol(Rh))(-1) and a low activation energy of 24.2 kJ/mol. The results of the kinetic studies show that the catalytic hydrolysis of AB over the Rh/g-C3N4 catalyst is a zero-order reaction with the AB concentration and a first-order reaction with the Rh concentration. This work demonstrates that g-C3N4 is a useful support to design and synthesis of effective Rh-based catalyst for hydrogen-based applications. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available