4.7 Article

Effect of carbon precursor and initial pH on cobalt-doped carbon xerogel for oxygen reduction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 43, Issue 24, Pages 11047-11055

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.015

Keywords

Carbon xerogel; Cobalt doping; Oxygen reduction reaction; Catalyst

Funding

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme project [FRGS/1/2014/TK04/UKW02/1]
  2. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia through University Research Grants [DIP-2017-024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, cobalt-doped carbon xerogel (Co-CX) was synthesised via sol-gel polymerisation of phenolic compounds (i.e., resorcinol, phenol and m-cresol) and formaldehyde, and this polymerisation was catalysed by cobalt nitrate and followed by a carbonisation process. The effect of the initial pH value (5.5, 6.5 and 7.5) as well as the type of carbon precursors on the structural properties of Co-CX was investigated via field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The catalytic activity of Co-CX for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in 0.1 M KOH was studied using a rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) technique. The structural properties and ORR activities were affected by different initial pH values as well as the type of carbon precursor. A carbon precursor consisting of resorcinol-formaldehyde with an initial pH value of 7.5 exhibited the best catalytic activity. The initial pH plays an important role in promoting micro/mesopores. The FESEM and BET results revealed that Co doping promotes the formation of additional pores. The RRDE result indicated that Co-CX exhibited good catalytic activity that tends to favour a four-electron pathway. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available