4.7 Article

Single Ru atom supported on defective graphene for water splitting: DFT and microkinetic investigation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 43, Issue 10, Pages 4880-4892

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.122

Keywords

Density functional theory; Microkinetic analysis; Water splitting; Defective graphene

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776004, 21376013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a comprehensive understanding of sing Ru atom supported on defective graphene for water splitting using density functional theory calculations and microkinetic analysis. The structural and electronic properties of Ru atom supported single vacancy graphene (SVG), double vacancy graphene (DVG) and Stone-Wales graphene (SWG) are systematically investigated. We find that the Ru atom can be trapped effectively by the defects on each defective graphene surfaces. The binding strength of the single Ru atom onto defective graphene surfaces follows the order: Ru@SVG > Ru@DVG > Ru@SWG. After binding, the d-band centers in Ru@SVG, Ru@DVG and Ru@SWG are about -1.67, -1.36, -1.02 eV, respectively. We find that the reaction barrier of H2O splitting decreases with increase of Ru d-band center. The reaction activity of H2O splitting are as follows: Ru@SVG < Ru@DVG < Ru@SWG. The splitting of water molecule on Ru@SWG surface only need a small activation energy of 0.43 eV. In addition, in the temperature range of 300-600 K, the Ru@SWG presents better reaction activity for H2O splitting. The reaction rate and turnover frequency are orders of magnitude larger than that on Ru@SVG and Ru@DVG. Overall, our study provides insights on the significant role of a single metal atom on defective graphene. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available