4.7 Article

A comparative study of experimental flow boiling heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics in porous-wall microchannel heat sink

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 818-833

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.06.090

Keywords

Microchannel heat sink; Porous-wall; Flow boiling; Heat transfer; Pressure drop

Funding

  1. Science & Technology Project of Beijing Education Committee [KZ201810005006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we proposed a porous-wall (PW) microchannel heat sink, in which micro pin fin arrays were fabricated on sidewalls of rectangular microchannels by MEMS (Microelectrical Mechanical System) technique. High speed flow visualizations were performed simultaneously with heat transfer and pressure drop measurements to investigate the flow boiling characteristics of PW microchannel heat sink. Conventional rectangular (Rec) microchannel heat sink was also explored together as a comparison. Experiments were carried out with pure acetone liquid at inlet temperature of 30 degrees C, mass flux from 255 kg/(m(2).s) to 843 kg/(m(2).s), heat flux from 4 W/cm(2) to 110 W/cm(2) and the maximum vapor quality at the outlet of the channel was 0.88. Experimental results demonstrated that the PW microchannels reduce wall superheat of onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) and improve critical heat flux (CHF) compared to the Rec microchannels. Moreover, the PW microchannels show significant heat transfer enhancement, pressure drop reduction and mitigation of two-phase flow instability. The porous walls provide numerous nucleation sites and the intensive pin fins arrangements introduce significant wicking effect to maintain the liquid rewetting, which contribute to the above notable flow boiling enhancement. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available