4.5 Article

Persistent and fluctuating anxiety levels in the 18 months following acute myocardial infarction: the role of personality

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.11.010

Keywords

Myocardial infarction; Anxiety; Trajectories; Personality; Depression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify the varying courses of anxiety symptoms in the first 18 months after a myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the importance of personality in determining elevated anxiety. Methods: Four hundred eighty-six MI patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory during hospitalization and at 2-, 12-and 18-months post-MI. At baseline, patients also completed the DS14 Type D personality scale, Anxiety Sensitivity Index and Beck Depression Inventory, and clinical and sociodemographic information was collected. Results: Growth mixture modeling analysis identified four anxiety trajectories. The majority of patients reported stable anxiety scores over time, indicative of either persistent high (17%) or low(71%) anxiety. Patients in the other two smaller groups initially reported moderate levels of anxiety that fluctuated during follow-up. Type D personality [odds ratio (OR)=5.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.26-12.63], negative affectivity (OR=3.24; 95% CI: 1.29-8.14) and anxiety sensitivity (OR=3.35; 95% CI: 1.69-6.62) were the most prominent determinants of persistent high anxiety, independent of depression, sociodemographic and clinical factors. Conclusions: The course of anxiety in the first 18 months after MI is relatively stable for the majority of patients. Patients with Type D personality, negative affectivity and anxiety sensitivity are at an increased risk for persisting elevated anxiety and should be identified and offered appropriate treatment. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available