4.7 Article

Influence of channel scale on the convective heat transfer of CO2 at supercritical pressure in vertical tubes

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 201-210

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.04.080

Keywords

Supercritical pressure; Convective heat transfer; Channel scale; Buoyancy; Flow acceleration

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406096, 51536004]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20151080379]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Channel scales vary from several centimeters to several micrometers in various industrial applications that conduct convective heat transfer at supercritical pressures. The heat transfer performance reveals relatively different features even under similar Reynolds number and thermphysical property conditions. The authors investigated the influence of the channel scale on the supercritical convective heat transfer based on the experimental results conducted on vertical tubes with inner diameters of 0.27 mm and 2.0 mm. Numerical simulations using several low Reynolds number k-epsilon turbulence models were also discussed to evaluate the performance of turbulence models when modelling supercritical heat transfer in tubes of various scales. The results exhibited significant heat transfer deterioration due to flow acceleration effect in the 0.27 mm tube at a heat flux to mass flux ratio of about 0.2, whereas the 2.0 mm tube at a similar inlet Reynolds number and heat flux to mass flux ratio exhibited great heat transfer enhancement due to the buoyancy effect. The heat transfer deterioration in the 0.27 mm tube can be explained by its relation to the redistributed mean velocity profiles and the relatively small energy-containing scale while relatively large dissipation scale as compared to those in the 2.0 mm tube. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available