4.7 Article

Heat extraction mechanism in a geothermal reservoir with rough-walled fracture networks

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 1083-1093

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.103

Keywords

Equivalent heat transfer coefficient; Heat extraction; Unified pipe-network method; Geothermal reservoir; Rough-walled fractures

Funding

  1. Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
  2. University Postgraduate Award for International Students (UPAIS) from the Australian Government
  3. Top-Up Scholarship from the University of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims at understanding the mechanism of heat extraction from a geothermal reservoir characterized by rough-walled fracture networks. A unified pipe-network method (UPM) which simplifies both fractures and the rock matrix as pipes is developed considering the local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) theory, and it is verified against an analytical solution. Three-dimensional simulations of macroscopic fluid flow and heat transfer in a fractured geothermal reservoir are conducted to take account of fracture roughness. The channeling effect and the heterogeneous distribution of fluid temperature in a core-scale model with a rough-walled fracture surface are simulated. An equivalent heat transfer coefficient (EHTC) is obtained from numerical experiments with respect to the flow rate, mechanical aperture and the equivalent hydraulic aperture. A representative element volume is then used to investigate the flow and heat transfer process in a geothermal reservoir with rough-walled fracture networks by applying the obtained EHTC. Results demonstrate that it is essential to use the proposed EHTC since the constant heat transfer coefficient (HTC) recommended in previous studies underestimates the final outlet fluid temperature in cases with rough-walled fractures. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available