4.6 Article

Impact of inner reservoir faults on migration and storage of injected CO2

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.03.006

Keywords

CO2 Geological storage; Inner reservoir faults; Numerical model; CO2 migration; Ordos Basin

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502258]
  2. Major Project of China National Science and Technology [2016ZX05016005-002]
  3. China Geological Survey working project [121201012000150010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 geological storage (CGS) is an effective way to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, and geological security is one of the most important issues in CGS. The faults distributed in geological formations make multi-layered reservoirs interconnected systems. A three-dimensional (3D) numerical model was established to evaluate the effects of inner reservoir faults on the CO2 migration and storage capacity of an actual CGS demonstration project in the Ordos Basin of China. The results show that the faults in the layered reservoir system could significantly affect the migration of injected CO2. The cross-layer faults at the bottom of the faulted reservoir could act as preferential passages between the upper and lower geological formations, causing the CO2 in the reservoir formation to move upward to adjacent layers rather than to lateral migration. CO2 migration along the inner-layer faults widely occurred at the top of the reservoir formation, decreasing the pressure accumulation and CO2 saturation around the injection well. Based on the simulation, CO2 will have migrated into the Heshanggou Formation after 300 years, and most of the CO2 will be trapped in the bottom sub-layers, with no CO2 intruding into the upper caprock. The spatial and temporal evolution of the injected CO2 was well presented for the faulted reservoir system, suggesting that the faults inside the multi-layered reservoir are beneficial to CGS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available