4.6 Article

Reliable prediction of aqueous dew points in CO2 pipelines and new approaches for control during shut-in

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 97-104

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.01.001

Keywords

CO2 pipelines; CO2 specification; Dew point control; Corrosion

Funding

  1. Chevron [AES 17-P1ABU-149]
  2. Australian Research Council through the Industrial Transformation Training Centre for LNG Futures [IC150100019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate predictions and precise control of the allowable water content in CO2-rich fluids are required in large-scale pipeline operations. Especially during transient shut-in and re-start operations, the pressure decrease associated with cooling may cause the CO2-rich mixture to pass through its dew point, producing an aqueous liquid phase. The pH of this liquid aqueous phase will rapidly decrease as carbonic acid is formed, greatly accelerating the corrosion rate of the carbon steel pipeline. The phase behaviour of CO2-rich fluid mixtures is qualitatively different to that of hydrocarbons, and standard oil and gas property packages in process simulation software may be inadequate for predicting dew points and other key properties. An extensive literature survey reveals 34 data sets where water contents of CO2-rich fluids have been measured near conditions relevant to CO2 pipelines. Following consistency tests, 23 data sets were found to be of good quality and 11 data sets were found to be of poor quality. The good-quality data were compared with predictions from 6 equations of state. Overall, Multiflash's RKS (Advanced) model was found to provide the best agreement with the aqueous dew point data of CO2-rich fluid phases. A case study is presented wherein it is demonstrated that the formation of a corrosive aqueous phase can be avoided during shut-in via introduction of a relatively small volume of ethanol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available