4.5 Article

Consensus Building for Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations with Expected Additive Consistency

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1495-1510

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-018-0451-1

Keywords

Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element; Group decision making; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations; Expected additive consistency; Consensus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As an extension of hesitant fuzzy element, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element (PHFE) has received increasing attention. However, some important issues in PHFE utilization remain to be addressed. This study aims to build a consensus among the decision makers for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations (PHFPRs) with expected additive consistency. First, several generalized operations that are suitable for PHFPRs are defined. Then, expected additive consistent PHFPRs are introduced, and a theorem is proposed to obtain them. Second, the consistency index is defined based on the Hausdorff distance of PHFE to measure whether individual PHFPRs exhibit acceptable expected additive consistency. If not, then an automatic iterative algorithm is designed to obtain acceptable ones. Third, group PHFPR is obtained based on the proposed generalized operations, and then the consensus index is determined according to the Hausdorff distance. If at least one of the consensus levels of the decision makers is lower than a given threshold, then an automatic iterative algorithm is used to update the PHFPRs to reach a predefined consensus level. Finally, a numerical example is provided, and comparative analyses with existing methods are performed to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method in addressing group decision-making problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available