4.3 Article

Gross motor coordination and weight status of Portuguese children aged 6-14 years

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 681-689

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22715

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. POPRAM III, within the scope of the European Social Funds, via CITMA
  2. Professional Qualification Centre
  3. Government of Autonomous Region of Madeira through the Regional Secretary for Education and Human Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesTo construct age- and gender-specific percentiles for gross motor coordination (MC) tests and to explore differences in gross MC in normal-weight, overweight and obese children. MethodsData are from the Healthy Growth of Madeira Study, a cross-sectional study carried out in children, aged 6-14 years. All 1,276 participants, 619 boys and 657 girls, were assessed for gross MC (Korperkoordinations Test fur Kinder, KTK), anthropometry (height and body mass), physical activity (Baecke questionnaire) and socioeconomic status (SES). Centile curves for gross MC were obtained for boys and girls separately using generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. ResultsA significant main effect for age was found in walking backwards and moving sideways. Boys performed significantly better than girls on moving sideways. At the upper limit of the distributions, interindividual variability was higher in hopping on one leg (girls) and jumping and moving sideways (boys and girls). One-way ANCOVA, controlling for age, physical activity and SES, indicated that normal-weight children scored significantly better than their obese peers in all gross MC tests. Overweight boys and girls also scored significantly better than their obese colleagues in some MC tests. ConclusionsThese centile curves can be used as reference data in Portuguese children and youth, aged 6-14 years. Being overweight or obese was a major limitation in MC tests and, therefore, of the children's health- and performance-related physical fitness. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27:681-689, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available