4.5 Article

Chemical characterisation and hypolipidaemic effects of two purified Pleurotus eryngii polysaccharides

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 10, Pages 2298-2307

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.13821

Keywords

Characterisation; hypolipidaemic effects; Pleurotus eryngii polysaccharides

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81473172, 81720108030, 81773695]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M621658, 2017M621659, 2014M560410, 2014M560409]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Program for Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is focused on the isolation and characterisation of two purified polysaccharide fractions (namely PPEP-1 and PPEP-2) from Pleurotus eryngii (P.eryngii) and evaluation of their hypolipidaemic effects. The Congo red analysis indicated that PPEP-2 but not PPEP-1 possessed a triple-helix conformation. The atomic force microscope analysis revealed that PPEP-1 and PPEP-2 showed different polysaccharide chain conformations. Importantly, the mice treated with PPEP-1 showed significantly lowered serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol when compared with the hyperlipidaemia mice induced by the high-fat diet. However, PPEP-2 revealed less hypolipidaemic effect than PPEP-1. Additionally, both PPEP-1 and PPEP-2 demonstrated remarkable hypolipidaemic effects by decreasing levels of serum TC, TG and LDL-c in the hyperlipidaemic model induced by P-407. Taken together, our findings suggest that the P.eryngii polysaccharides, especially PPEP-1, could be developed as a natural functional food supplement for preventing hyperlipidaemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available