4.3 Article

Evaluation of Nutrient Removal and Biomass Production Through Mixotrophic, Heterotrophic, and Photoautotrophic Cultivation of Chlorella in Nitrate and Ammonium Wastewater

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 167-178

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s41742-018-0077-z

Keywords

Chlorella vulgaris; Heterotrophic; Mixotrophic; Nutrient removal; Photoautotrophic

Funding

  1. University of Tehran
  2. Tehran Province Water and Wastewater Company
  3. [11.68722]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effect of mixotrophic, heterotrophic, photoautotrophic (CO2 of air source), and photoautotrophic (bicarbonate source) cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris was investigated on microalgae growth rate and nutrient removal under different kinds of nitrogen sources. The highest N-NH3+, N-NO3-, P-PO43- (in ammonium source), and P-PO43- (in nitrate source) removal efficiency (87.28 +/- 0.89, 70.00 +/- 1.20, 87.00 +/- 3.10, and 78.10 +/- 1.95%, respectively) was reached in the mixotrophic culture. In all cultivations, when nitrate was used as the nitrogen source, specific growth rate, biomass productivity, and specific oxygen production rate (SOPR) were higher than the one with ammonium source due to decreased pH. However, in all cultures except for photoautotrophic cultivation (in the CO2 of the air), nitrogen removal rates improved in the ammonium source. In addition, in both ammonium and nitrate source, the respiration activity of mixotrophic microalgae was higher than the photosynthetic activity of the cells. When CO2 was used as inorganic carbon, the specific growth rate of microalgae was lower than with the bicarbonate source. Based on the obtained results, mixotrophic conditions would be the most useful cultivation for application in N-rich wastewater treatment systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available