4.7 Article

Experimental and optimization of material synthesis process parameters for improving capacity of lithium-ion battery

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 3400-3409

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.4079

Keywords

cycle life; discharge capacity; genetic programming; lithium-ion battery

Funding

  1. Viet Nam National University [NV2018-18-01]
  2. Sailing Plan of Guangdong Province, China
  3. Shantou University Scientific Research Foundation [16002, NTF 16011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New methods for synthesis of active materials have been developed to improve capacity and cycle life performance of lithium-ion batteries. Past studies have focused on routes of development of materials and new processes, which might not be economical for large-scale production. In this regard, this study examines a widely employed carbothermal reduction technology for the synthesis of lithium-iron phosphate (LiFePO4/C) and investigates effects of process conditions during this synthesis on final battery performance. An experimental combined genetic programming approach is used to model the effects of crucial process conditions (sintering time, the carbon content, and the sintering temperature) on the discharge capacity of the assembled battery. Experiments are conducted to collect the discharge capacity data based on varying LiFePO4/C synthesis conditions, and genetic programming is employed to develop a suitable functional relationship between them. The results show that the battery discharge capacity is controlled significantly by adjusting sintering temperature and carbon content, while the effect of sintering time is found to be insignificant. Further, the interaction effect of the sintering time and carbon content is much more obvious than that of the sintering time and the sintering temperature. The findings from the study pave the way for the optimum design of the synthesis process of LiFePO4/C for a higher battery performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available