4.3 Article

Amla (Phyllanthus emblica L.) enhances iron dialysability and uptake in in vitro models

Journal

CURRENT SCIENCE
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages 1859-1866

Publisher

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES

Keywords

Anaemia; amla; iron bioavailability; in vitro digestion model

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DSTDPRP scheme), Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phyllanthus emblica L. (Indian gooseberry or amla) is a well-known dietary supplement (Rasayana) in Ayurveda used in the management of iron deficiency anaemia (Pandu). Am la is said to act by regulating the 'metabolic fire' (agni), which is important for proper digestion and absorption of nutrients. In the present study standard cell-free and cell-based models that are employed in biomedical sciences to study digestion and bioavailability of nutrients were used to examine the influence of amla fruit juice on iron dialysability and uptake. Am la juice contained 0.35% ascorbic acid (AA), 0.33% tannins (gallic acid equivalent), 0.13% gallic acid, 0.58% total organic acid and 0.002% iron on a w/w basis. Am la juice exhibited a dose response to iron dialysability with an optimum at 1 : 0.25 molar ratio of Fe: amla juice (AA equivalent) in the cell-free digestion model and 1 : 0.5 in both Caco-2 and HepG2 cell lines. Amla juice increased the dialysable iron three times more than the FeSO4 alone control in the cell-free digestion model. Iron uptake in Caco-2 and HepG2 cell lines increased 17.18 and 18.71 times more than the control respectively, in the presence of amla juice. AA, a known Fe bioavailability enhancer, at the same molar ratios showed an enhancement only by 1.45 times in the cell-free model and 13.01 and 12.48 times in the Caco-2 and HepG2 models respectively. As a dietary supplement that enhances iron dialysability and uptake, amla fruits can be explored further as a low-cost intervention in the management of iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available