4.6 Article

ACEF score adapted to ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: The ACEF-STEMI score

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages 18-24

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.017

Keywords

ST-elevation myocardial infarction; ACEF score; Risk stratification; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. Austrian Society of Cardiology
  2. Tiroler Wissenschaftsfonds
  3. intramural funding program of the Medical University Innsbruck for young scientists MUI-START [2015-06-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The age, creatinine and ejection fraction (ACEF) score has originally been developed for risk stratification of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. In patients with stable coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the prognostic accuracy of ACEF could be further improved by modifying the original scoring system (called modified ACEF or ACEF-MDRD). We aimed to specifically adapt the ACEF score for risk assessment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods: In this observational study, 390 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were included. Clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) comprising all-cause mortality, non-fatal re-infarction, stroke and new congestive heart failure. Results: Original ACEF (area under the curve (AUC): 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.73]; p = 0.01) and ACEF-MDRD score (AUC: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.53-0.72]; p = 0.01) significantly but weakly predicted MACE (n = 41, 11%). The addition of creatinine > 2 mg/dl (as suggested in original ACEF, p = 0.32) or eGFR steps as proposed in ACEF-MDRD (p = 0.17) to age/EF ratio were not associated with net reclassification improvements (NRI), but Delta eGRF (>10 ml/min/1.73 m(2) decrease within three days after PCI) led to an NRI of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.14-0.45; p < 0.001). Replacement of cross-sectional renal assessment by Delta eGRF and addition of 3 clinical parameters (diabetes, anterior infarct location and C-reactive protein), forming the new ACEF-STEMI score, led to a significant improvement in MACE prediction (AUC: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.66-0.84]) as compared to original ACEF or ACEF-MDRD (both p = 0.03). Conclusions: In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the novel ACEF-STEMI score provided strong prognostic value and superior discriminative ability as compared to the previously described original ACEF or ACEF-MDRD scores. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available