4.6 Article

Global longitudinal strain corrected by RR-interval is a superior echocardiographic predictor of outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages 42-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.038

Keywords

Echocardiography; Speckle tracking; Strain; Atrial fibrillation; Outcome; Mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Echocarcliographic assessment of systolic and diastolic function during atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. This study evaluates he prognostic value of strain in patients with AF and suggests a novel approach on how to Lake into account the varying heart cycle lengths in AF. Methods: Echocardiograms from 204 patients with AF during examination were analyzed offline. Patients with known heart failure (HF) were excluded. Peak global longitudinal strain (GLS) was averaged from 18 myocardial segments. To adjust for the varying heart cycle lengths, we indexed GLS with the square Fool of the RR-interval, (GLS/root(RR)). The composite endpoint included incident HF, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Results: During a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 82 patients (40%) reached the composite endpoint. Decreasing GLS [(RR) was significantly associated with the composite endpoint, and the risk of reaching the endpoint increased significantly per 1%/sec(1/2) decrease in strain (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-120, p < 0.001). GLS/root(RR) remained an independent predictor even after adjustment for various risk factors and conventional echocardiography (LVEF and E/e') (HR 1.10, 95% Cl: 1.02-1.19, p = 0.017). In contrast, GLS did not remain a significant predictor after adjusting for the same variables (p = 0.07), neither did LVEF (p = 0.11). Conclusion: Decreasing GLS/root(RR) was significantly associated with increased risk of an adverse outcome and remained an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. Indexing GLS with the square root of the RR-interval can counteract the variable cycle length in Al patients and GLS/root(RR) offers a more convincing risk-stratification assessment in AF patients compared with GLS. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available