4.7 Article

Characterization of truncated endo-beta-1,4-glucanases from a compost metagenomic library and their saccharification potentials

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 554-562

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.102

Keywords

Compost metagenome; GH6 endoglucanase; Truncated enzymes; Saccharification

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2013R1A1A4A01013394]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gene encoding an endo-beta-1,4-glucanase (Cel6H-f481) was cloned from a compost metagenomic library. The gene, cel6H-f481, was composed of 1446 bp to encode a fused protein of 481 amino acid residues (50,429 Da), i.e., 445 residues (CeI6H-445) from the metagenome, and 36 residues from the pUC19 vector at N-terminus. Cel6H-445 belonged to glycosyl hydrolase (GH) family 6 and showed 71% identity with Actinotalea fermentans endoglucanase with low coverage. Several active bands of truncated forms were observed by activity staining of the crude extract. Major truncated enzymes of 35 (Cel6H-p35) and 23 kDa (Cel6H-p23) were separated by HiTrap Q chromatography. The two enzymes had the same optimum temperature (50 degrees C) and pH (5.5), but Cel6H-p35 was more thermostable than Cel6H-p23 and other GH6 endoglucanases reported. Both enzymes efficiently hydrolyzed carboxymethyl-cellulose (CMC) and barley beta-glucan, but hardly hydrolyzed other substrates tested. The V-max of Cel6H-p35 for CMC was 1.4 times greater than that of Cel6H-p23. The addition of the crude enzymes to a commercial enzyme set increased the saccharification of pretreated rice straw powder by up to 30.9%. These results suggest the N-terminal region of Cel6H-p35 contributes to thermostability and specific activity, and that the enzymes might be a useful additive for saccharification. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available