4.7 Article

Retrieval of forest biomass for tropical deciduous mixed forest using ALOS PALSAR mosaic imagery and field plot data

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2018.03.007

Keywords

Aboveground biomass; ALOS PALSAR; MIMICS-I model

Categories

Funding

  1. DST-PURSE of Jawaharlal Nehru University
  2. National Academy of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical forest is an important ecosystem rich in biodiversity and structural complexity with high woody biomass content. Longer wavelength radar data at L-band sensor provides improved forest biomass (AGB) information due to its higher penetration level and sensitivity to canopy structure. The study presents a regression based woody biomass estimation for tropical deciduous mixed forest dominated by Shores robusta using ALOS PALSAR mosaic (HH, HV) and field data at the lower Himalayan belt of Northern India. For the purpose of understanding the scattering mechanisms at L-band from this forest type, Michigan Microwave Canopy Scattering model (MIMICS-I) was parameterized with field data to simulate bacicscatter across polarization and incidence range. Regression analysis between field measured forest biomass and L-band bacicscatter data from PALSAR mosaic show retrieval of woody biomass up to 100 Mg ha(-1) with error between 92 and 94 Mg ha(-1) and coefficient of determination (r(2)) between 0.53 and 0.55 for HH and HH + HV polarized channel at 0.25 ha resolution. This positive relationship could be due to strong volume scattering from ground/trunk interaction at HH-polarized while in combination with direct canopy scattering for HV-polarization at ALOS specific incidence angles as predicted by MIMICS-I model. This study has found that L-band SAR data from currently ALOS-1/-2 and upcoming joint NASA-ISRO SAR (NISAR) are suitable for mapping forest biomass <= 100 Mg ha(-1) at 25 m resolution in far incidence range in dense deciduous mixed forest of Northern India.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available