4.7 Article

The urban heat island in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the last 30 years using remote sensing data

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2017.08.012

Keywords

Urban heat island; Remote sensing; Land-surface temperature; Land-use; Urban planning

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/201.521/2014, E-26/110.822/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work is to study urban heat island (UHI) in Metropolitan Area of Rio de Janeiro (MARJ) based on the analysis of land-surface temperature (LST) and land-use patterns retrieved from Landsat-5/Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat-7/Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM +) and Landsat-8/Operational Land Imager (011) and Thermal Infrared Sensors (TIRS) data covering a 32-year period between 1984 and 2015. LST temporal evolution is assessed by comparing the average LST composites for 1984-1999 and 2000-2015 where the parametric Student t-test was conducted at 5% significance level to map the pixels where LST for the more recent period is statistically significantly greater than the previous one. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum test has also confirmed at the same 5% significance level that the more recent period (2000-2015) has higher LST values. UHI intensity between urban and rural/urban low density (vegetation) areas for 1984-1999 and 2000-2015 was established and confirmed by both parametric and non-parametric tests at 1% significance level as 3.3 degrees C (5.1 degrees C) and 4.4 degrees C (7.1 degrees C), respectively. LST has statistically significantly (p-value < 0.01) increased over time in two of three land cover classes (urban and urban low density), respectively by 1.9 degrees C and 0.9 degrees C, except in vegetation class. A spatial analysis was also performed to identify the urban pixels within MARJ where UHI is more intense by subtracting the LST of these pixels from the LST mean value of vegetation land-use class.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available