4.7 Article

Effect of residual doxycycline concentrations on resistance selection and transfer in porcine commensal Escherichia coli

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 123-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.04.018

Keywords

Doxycycline; Residues; E. coli; Resistance selection; Plasmid transfer

Funding

  1. Belgian Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment [RT 12/03 CROSSCONTAM]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pig feed may contain various levels of antimicrobial residues due to cross-contamination. A previous study showed that a 3% carry-over level of doxycycline (DOX) in the feed results in porcine faecal concentrations of approximately 4 mg/L. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of residual DOX concentrations (1 and 4 mg/L) in vitro on selection of DOX-resistant porcine commensal Escherichia coli and transfer of their resistance plasmids. Three different DOX-resistant porcine commensal E. coli strains and their plasmids were characterised. These strains were each brought in competition with a susceptible strain in a medium containing 0, 1 and 4 mg/L DOX. Resistant bacteria, susceptible bacteria and transconjugants were enumerated after 24 h and 48 h. The tet(A)-carrying plasmids showed genetic backbones that are also present among human E. coli isolates. Ratios of resistant to susceptible bacteria were significantly higher at 1 and 4 mg/L DOX compared with the blank control, but there was no significant difference between 1 and 4 mg/L. Plasmid transfer frequencies were affected by 1 or 4 mg/L DOX in the medium for only one of the resistance plasmids. In conclusion, DOX concentrations of 1 and 4 mg/L can select for resistant E. coli in vitro. Further research is needed to determine the effect of these concentrations in the complex environment of the porcine intestinal microbiota. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available