4.7 Article

Fabrication and perfusion culture of anatomically shaped artificial bone using stereolithography

Journal

BIOFABRICATION
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/6/4/045002

Keywords

bone tissue engineering; rapid prototyping; porous scaffold; bioreactor; cell culture; osteogenesis

Funding

  1. Funding Program for Next Generation World Leading Researchers [LR010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000433]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LC201020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because patient bone defects are usually varied and complicated in geometry, it would be preferred to fabricate custom-made artificial bone grafts that are anatomically specific to individual patient defects. Using a rabbit femoral segment as a bone reconstruction model, we successfully produced customized ceramic scaffolds by stereolithography, which not only had an anatomically correct external shape according to computed tomography data but also contained an interconnecting internal network of channels designed for perfusion culture. Rabbit bone marrow stromal cells were isolated and cultured with these scaffolds using a novel oscillatory perfusion system that was stereolithographically fabricated to fit well to the unique scaffold shapes. After five days of three-dimensional culture with oscillatory perfusion, the cells attached and proliferated homogenously in the scaffolds. However, control cells inside the scaffolds cultured under static conditions were dead after prolonged in vitro culture. Cellular DNA content and alkaline phosphatase activities were significantly higher in the perfusion group versus the static group. Therefore, anatomically correct artificial bone can be successfully constructed using stereolithography and oscillatory culture technology, and could be useful for bone engraftment and defect repair.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available