4.6 Article

Study on burr occurrence and surface integrity during slot milling of multidirectional and plain woven CFRPs

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1937-6

Keywords

Carbon fibers; Slot milling; Burr formation; Surface integrity

Funding

  1. Research Project Program of the Education Committee of Tianjin [2017KJ079]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531107050870]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [16JCYBJC41300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Machining carbon fiber reinforced composite (CFRP) is often accompanied with cutting edge defects and surface damage including interlayer delamination, cavities and debonding of fiber-matrix. A detailed understanding of the effect of fiber configuration and cutting parameters on cutting force, burr occurrence/formation and surface integrity is necessary. In this paper, experimental data is presented relating to fiber burrs on entry surface, cutting force, surface roughness and workpiece integrity when slot milling CFRP laminates with varying fiber configurations (0A degrees/90A degrees, 45A degrees/135A degrees and plain woven) at different cutting speed (60 and 120 m/min) and feed rate (0.05 and 0.1 mm/rev). Lateral cutting force is recorded down to 56 N and highly dependent on fiber orientation. The length (up to similar to 5.6 mm) and amount of fiber burrs are highly related to fiber orientation and fiber cutting angle. Surface roughness Ra down to similar to 1.4 mu m was recorded when milling type 2 (45A degrees/135A degrees) and type 3 (plain woven) laminates. Various surface defects predominantly occurred due to different cutting conditions and fiber configurations, which are mainly located in the layers with fibers orientated at 45A degrees/135A degrees. The occurrence and propagation of fiber burrs and surface cavities were also investigated based on different fiber fracture mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available