4.7 Article

Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of gamma-TiAl honeycomb structure fabricated by isothermal forging and pulse current assisted diffusion bonding

Journal

INTERMETALLICS
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 59-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2018.05.008

Keywords

gamma-TiAl based alloy; Honeycomb structure; Isothermal forging; Pulse current assisted diffusion bonding; Microstructure evolution

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51675125, 51775135, 51305100, 51205081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hot deformation behavior and pulse current assisted diffusion bonding (PCDB) behavior of sintered gamma-TiAl based alloy with near gamma microstructure were investigated for fabricating honeycomb structure via isothermal forging - PCDB route. Honeycomb core structures were fabricated via isothermal forging at 1150-1250 degrees C with a nominal strain rate of 10(-3) s(-1) based on the hot deformation behavior of the sintered alloy. Additionally, the mechanical property and structural morphology demonstrated that the best forging parameter was forging at 1200 degrees C with a nominal strain rate of 10(-3) s(-1). Subsequently, the effects of bonding temperature, holding time, and bonding pressure on the microstructure evolution, plastic strain, and shear strength of the PCDB joints were investigated. The plastic strain and shear strength of the PCDB joints increased with increasing bonding temperature, time and stress, additionally, the fracture mode transformed from interfacial sliding fracture into substrate fracture with the optimization of bonding parameters. Furthermore, a sound metallurgical bonding joint with smaller plastic strain and shear strength as high as 92% of the base material was achieved at 1100 degrees C with a holding time of 20 min and a pressure of 25 MPa, showing priority compared to traditional hot pressing diffusion bonding process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available