4.7 Article

The elastic behaviors and theoretical tensile strength of γ-TiAl alloy from the first principles calculations

Journal

INTERMETALLICS
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2018.07.001

Keywords

Elastic modulus; Tensile strength; First-principles calculation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704020, 11647010]
  2. Higher Education and High-quality and World-class Universities [PY201611]
  3. BUCT Fund for Disciplines Construction [XK1702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The temperature dependent elastic modulus and theoretical tensile strength have been investigated by the first-principles calculations to get insight into the mechanical performance of gamma-TiAl in the case of high temperature and impurity. The phase stability of gamma-TiAl at elevated temperature has been proved by calculating the phonon dispersion relations and elastic constants. The elastic modulus B, G and E decrease linearly by 8%, 22%, and 20% respectively with the temperature increasing from 0 K to 850 K. The reduction of B is small, indicating that the resistance to external pressure for gamma-TiAl is still superior at high temperature. The reduced G/B ratio of 0.488 endows gamma-TiAl fairly good ductility at elevated temperature. The tensile test shows that the ideal tensile strength is somewhat reduced due to the presence of impurity (C, O, P, and S) in comparison with pure gamma-TiAl. Compared to C, P, and S, the 0 impurities are more easily trapped in gamma-TiAl matrix with largely negative formation energy. For the gamma-TiAl compound, the values of theoretical tensile strength corresponding to the first phonon instability are 16.1 GPa, 5.3 GPa, 6.3 GPa, and 14.6 GPa along [100], [001], [110], and [111] directions, respectively. For TiAl-O system, we obtained the values of 15.1 GPa, 10.8 GPa, 6.4 GPa, and 13.3 GPa, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available