4.6 Article

Potential impacts on ecosystem services of land use transitions to second-generation bioenergy crops in GB

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 317-333

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12263

Keywords

biofuel crops; ecological processes; ecosystem services; GIS; land use; Miscanthus; short-rotation coppice; short-rotationforestry; sustainability; trade-offs

Funding

  1. UKERC
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/H013237/1]
  3. European Union (GHG-Europe project)
  4. BBSRC (GIANT-LINK project)
  5. NERC as part of the Carbo-BioCrop project [NE/H010742/1]
  6. MAGLUE project [EP/M013200/1]
  7. Addressing valuation of energy and nature together (ADVENT) [NE/M019713/1]
  8. EPSRC SUPERGEN Bioenergy projects [EP/K036734/1]
  9. EPSRC [EP/L024756/1, EP/K036734/1, EP/M013200/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. ESRC [ES/L011859/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. NERC [NE/H010742/1, NE/H010718/1, NE/M019713/1, NE/H013229/1, NE/H010645/1, NE/H013237/1, NE/M019764/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first assessment of the impact of land use change (LUC) to second-generation (2G) bioenergy crops on ecosystem services (ES) resolved spatially for Great Britain (GB). A systematic approach was used to assess available evidence on the impacts of LUC from arable, semi-improved grassland or woodland/forest, to 2G bioenergy crops, for which a quantitative threat matrix' was developed. The threat matrix was used to estimate potential impacts of transitions to either Miscanthus, short-rotation coppice (SRC, willow and poplar) or short-rotation forestry (SRF). The ES effects were found to be largely dependent on previous land uses rather than the choice of 2G crop when assessing the technical potential of available biomass with a transition from arable crops resulting in the most positive effect on ES. Combining these data with constraint masks and available land for SRC and Miscanthus (SRF omitted from this stage due to lack of data), south-west and north-west England were identified as areas where Miscanthus and SRC could be grown, respectively, with favourable combinations of economic viability, carbon sequestration, high yield and positive ES benefits. This study also suggests that not all prospective planting of Miscanthus and SRC can be allocated to agricultural land class (ALC) ALC 3 and ALC 4 and suitable areas of ALC 5 are only minimally available. Beneficial impacts were found on 146583 and 71890ha when planting Miscanthus or SRC, respectively, under baseline planting conditions rising to 293247 and 91318ha, respectively, under 2020 planting scenarios. The results provide an insight into the interplay between land availability, original land uses, bioenergy crop type and yield in determining overall positive or negative impacts of bioenergy cropping on ecosystems services and go some way towards developing a framework for quantifying wider ES impacts of this important LUC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available