4.7 Article

Insects as ingredients for bakery goods. A comparison study of H. illucens, A. domestica and T. molitor flours

Journal

INNOVATIVE FOOD SCIENCE & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 205-210

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.03.021

Keywords

Insects; Proteins; Bread; Dough; Rheology; Flour

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2014-52928-C2-1-R]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo 2017/189]
  3. European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to a rising demand for proteins, food industry is considering new alternative protein sources that can be used for human food. The aim of this research was to explore the potential use of insects' flour as protein-rich ingredient for bakery products. Hermetia illucens, Acheta domestica and Tenebrio molitor were ground and used to replace 5% wheat flour in doughs and breads. The protein content of the insect flours ranged from 45% to 57% (d.m.) and fat content from 27% to 36% (d.m.). The inclusion of insects' flour affected the rheological properties (water absorption and stability), of dough during mixing, having less water adsorption. Breadmaking process could be carried out with all the composite flours. Breads containing A. domestica flour showed similar specific volume and texture parameters than wheat bread, but with higher content of proteins and fibers. Globally, results confirmed the usefulness of insects' flour for making breads with improved nutritional value. Industrial relevance: This study evaluated the potential application of three different insects as protein source ingredients for bakery products. Results confirm that insects flour could be added to replace wheat flour in breads without significantly affecting dough properties and leading to breads with acceptable technological quality and improved nutritional profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available