4.7 Article

On pricing approximate queries

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 453, Issue -, Pages 198-215

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.036

Keywords

Approximate aggregate queries; Arbitrage free; Data market; Data pricing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61772228]
  2. National key research and development program of China [2016YFB0201503, 2016YFB0701101]
  3. Major Special Research Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province [20160203008GX]
  4. Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program [20170520066JH]
  5. Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University [2017069]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, data is being bought and sold in data markets whose prices are usually determined by vendors. In a data market, approximate aggregate queries over big data sets are often expensive due to computing time, machine resources and data prices. Therefore, sometimes consumers cannot obtain query results within preferred deadlines or under budgetary. Approximate aggregate queries with reasonable accuracy is a key technique to address this problem. However, there is no mature theory for pricing approximate aggregate queries. In this paper, we first propose a novel theoretical framework to support pricing approximate aggregate queries. By using a sampling technique to achieve an error-bounded approximate answer over data queries, a transforming function is provided to convert the original pricing function to the one that supports approximate aggregate queries. We further adopt a statistical method to estimate consumers' payments. The proposed transform function preserves the arbitrage free property. We implement a prototype system and through comparing our framework with two benchmark pricing methods, experiments show that our pricing method is much suitable for pricing approximate aggregate queries. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available