Journal
INFECTION
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 625-633Publisher
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-018-1162-0
Keywords
Candidemia; Internal medicine wards; Prediction rule; Risk factors
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
PurposeIncreasing prevalence of candidemia in Internal Medicine wards (IMWs) has been reported in recent years, but risk factors for candida bloodstream infection in patients admitted to IMW may differ from those known in other settings. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and define a prediction rule for the early recognition of the risk of candidemia in IMW inpatients.MethodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective, observational case-control study on non-neutropenic patients with candidemia admitted to IMWs of four large Italian Hospitals. Each eligible patient with candidemia (case) was matched to a control with bacteremia. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsOverall, 300 patients (150 cases and 150 controls) were enrolled. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of candidemia and weighted to build a score: total parenteral nutrition (OR 2.45, p=0.008; 1 point); central venous catheter (OR 2.19, p=0.031; 1 point); peripherally inserted central catheter (OR 5.63, p<0.0001; 3 points), antibiotic treatment prior (OR 2.06; p=0.059; 1 point) and during hospitalization (OR2.38, p=0.033; 1 point); neurological disability (OR 2.25, p=0.01; 1 point); and previous hospitalization within 3 months (OR 1.56, p=0.163; 1 point). At ROC curve analysis, a final score4 showed 84% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 80% accuracy in predicting the risk of candidemia.ConclusionsThe proposed scoring system showed to be a simple and highly performing tool in distinguishing bloodstream infections due to Candida and bacteria in patients admitted to IMW. The proposed rule might help to reduce delay in empirical treatment and improve appropriateness in antifungal prescription in septic patients.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available