4.7 Article

Comparative study on hydrolysis and bioethanol production from cardoon and rockrose pretreated by dilute acid hydrolysis

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 633-641

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.11.037

Keywords

Enzymatic hydrolysis; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF); Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF); Cynara cardunculus; Cistus ladcoufer

Funding

  1. INALENTEJO QREN (BioEcos Project - Valorizacao Integrada de Biomassa) [ALENT-09-0140-FEDER-000705 (QREN)]
  2. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) under project CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials [FCTUID/CTM/50011/2013]
  3. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) under project ICAAM-Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias e Ambientais Mediterranicas [FCTUID/AGR/00115/2013]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/CTM/50011/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioethanol production potential from cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) and rockrose (Cistus ladanifer), pretreated by diluted acid hydrolysis (DAH), was studied and compared by both, separate enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes. DAH pretreatment allowed an increase of 5 fold to cardoon and 16 fold to rockrose in cellulose accessibility towards enzymatic hydrolysis. Both plants showed better overall fermentation efficiency and ethanol yield in SSF than in SHF also with shorter processing periods, 24 h against 72 + 24 h, respectively. Results obtained for rockrose are about half the concentration and volumetric productivity of ethanol and 60% of the overall fermentation efficiency of those obtained for cardoon. The recalcitrance of rockrose to enzymatic hydrolysis was explained by higher abundance of lignin and extractives than in cardoon. Comparing the steam explosion (SE) and DAH pretreatments, the former was more advantageous for the recalcitrant rockrose in terms of enzymatic saccharification yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available