4.6 Review

Mixed Matrix Membranes for Natural Gas Upgrading: Current Status and Opportunities

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 12, Pages 4139-4169

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04796

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National University of Singapore [CENGas R-261-508-001-646]
  2. Ministry of Education - Singapore [MOE AcRF Tier 1 R-279-000-472-112]
  3. Agency for Science, Technology and Research [PSF R-279000-475-305, IRG R-279-000-510-305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past few decades, natural gas has attracted worldwide attention as one of the most desired energy sources owing to its more efficient and cleaner combustion process compared to that of coal and crude oil. Due to the presence of impurities, raw natural gas needs to be upgraded to meet the pipeline specifications. Membrane-based separation is a promising alternative to conventional processes such as cryogenic distillation and pressure swing adsorption. Among the existing membranes for natural gas upgrading, polymeric membranes and inorganic membranes have been extensively explored, but each type has its own pros and cons. The development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) by incorporating organic/inorganic fillers into the polymer matrix provides a good strategy to combine the merits of each material and fabricate novel membranes with superior gas separation performance. In this review, we first discuss the recent advances in MMMs showing potentials in natural gas upgrading. Special attention is paid to a detailed evaluation on the polymer and filler choices for acidic gas removal. After that, we analyze factors that influence the membrane separation performance and summarize effective strategies reported in the open literature for the fabrication of high-performance MMMs. Finally, a perspective on future research directions in this field is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available