Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table
Simon Lewin et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations
Heather Munthe-Kaas et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 4: how to assess coherence
Christopher J. Colvin et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data
Claire Glenton et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 7: understanding the potential impacts of dissemination bias
Andrew Booth et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series
Simon Lewin et al.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE (2018)
Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses
Ingrid Toews et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Susan Munabi-Babigumira et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2017)
Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR)
Simon Lewin et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)
What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women
S. Downe et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2016)
Current use was established and Cochrane guidance on selection of social theories for systematic reviews of complex interventions was developed
Jane Noyes et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey
Ingrid Toews et al.
PLOS ONE (2016)
Searching for qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a structured methodological review
Andrew Booth
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)
The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
Meghan A. Bohren et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2015)
Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)
Simon Lewin et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2015)
Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity
Lisa Maria Pfadenhauer et al.
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN (2015)
'Keep fit' exercise interventions to improve health, fitness and well-being of children and young people who use wheelchairs: mixed-method systematic review protocol
Thomas D. O'Brien et al.
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING (2014)
Intervention Now To Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement
Rh Whitaker et al.
BMJ OPEN (2014)
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide
Tammy C. Hoffmann et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)
Facilitators and barriers to facility-based delivery in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Meghan A. Bohren et al.
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (2014)
A systematic review of qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of task-shifting in midwifery services
Christopher J. Colvin et al.
MIDWIFERY (2013)
Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors
Belinda J. Burford et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness
Gordon H. Guyatt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2011)
Real world reviews: a beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions
C. Bambra
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH (2011)
Multi-context versus context-specific qualitative evidence syntheses: combining the best of both
Karin Hannes et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2011)
Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: The example of audit and feedback
Benjamin Gardner et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2010)
Population tobacco control interventions and their effects on social inequalities in smoking: placing an equity lens on existing systematic reviews
Caroline Main et al.
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH (2008)
Research results have expiration dates: ensuring timely systematic reviews
Julie Barroso et al.
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE (2006)
Share Paper
