4.8 Article

KLRG1+ Effector CD8+ T Cells Lose KLRG1, Differentiate into All Memory T Cell Lineages, and Convey Enhanced Protective Immunity

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 716-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.015

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Erwin Schrodinger Fellowship (Austrian Science Fund) [J3220-B19]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [16K19166, 22113006, 26221306, 21229007]
  3. Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation Fellowship
  4. University of Vienna KWA Scholarship
  5. NIH [1R01HG008383-01A1]
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency [CREST J098501018]
  7. Japan Science and Technology Agency (PRESTO)
  8. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26221306, 22113006, 21229007, 16K19166] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protective immunity against pathogens depends on the efficient generation of functionally diverse effector and memory T lymphocytes. However, whether plasticity during effector-to-memory CD8(+) T cell differentiation affects memory lineage specification and functional versatility remains unclear. Using genetic fate mapping analysis of highly cytotoxic KLRG1(+) effector CD8(+) T cells, we demonstrated that KLRG1(+) cells receiving intermediate amounts of activating and inflammatory signals downregulated KLRG1 during the contraction phase in a Bach2-dependent manner and differentiated into all memory T cell linages, including CX(3)CR1(int) peripheral memory cells and tissue-resident memory cells. ExKLRG1 memory cells retained high cytotoxic and proliferative capacity distinct from other populations, which contributed to effective anti-influenza and anti-tumor immunity. Our work demonstrates that developmental plasticity of KLRG1(+) effector CD8(+) T cells is important in promoting functionally versatile memory cells and long-term protective immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available