4.5 Article

Electrical characterisation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells stack using grasshopper optimiser

Journal

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 9-17

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2017.0232

Keywords

proton exchange membrane fuel cells; optimisation; sensitivity analysis; electrical characterisation; proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack; PEMFC; sum of square error; SSE; grasshopper optimisation algorithm; sensitivity analysis; GOA-based method; MATLAB-SIMULINK simulation model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, optimum values of unknown seven parameters of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) stack are generated for the sake of appropriate modelling. An objective function is adopted to minimise the sum of square errors (SSE) between the experimental data and the corresponding estimated results. A novel application of grasshopper optimisation algorithm (GOA) is engaged to minimise the SSE subjects to set of inequality constraints. Three study cases of typical commercial PEMFCs stacks are demonstrated and verified under various steady-state operating scenarios. Necessary subsequent comparisons to new results by others found in updated state-of-the-art are made. Sensitivity analysis of defined parameters is carried out. It is found that the PEMFC model is susceptible to the deviations of optimised parameters as the errors are substantially disturbed which signifies the value of the GOA-based method. In addition, performance measures to indicate the robustness of the GOA-based methodology are pointed out. At this moment, dynamic model of the stack is addressed and incorporated to demonstrate its dynamic response. Detailed MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation model is implemented to study the PEMFC dynamic performance. The simulated test cases emphasise the viability and effectivity of the GOA-based procedure in steady-state and dynamic simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available