4.7 Article

Estimating Energy Parameters for RNA Secondary Structure Predictions Using Both Experimental and Computational Data

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2813388

Keywords

RNA; Computational modeling; Gold; Data models; Protocols; Energy measurement; Biological system modeling; RNA secondary structure predictions; energy parameter; MD simulation; base-pairing probability matrix

Funding

  1. Hamada Laboratory of Waseda University [JP25240044]
  2. MEXT KAKENHI [JP25240044, JP24680031, JP16H05879, JP221S0002, JP16K17778]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06279] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational RNA secondary structure prediction depends on a large number of nearest-neighbor free-energy parameters, including 10 parameters for Watson-Crick stacked base pairs that were estimated from experimental measurements of the free energies of 90 RNA duplexes. These experimental data are provided by time-consuming and cost-intensive experiments. In contrast, various modified nucleotides in RNAs, which would affect not only their structures but also functions, have been found, and rapid determination of energy parameters for a such modified nucleotides is needed. To reduce the high cost of determining energy parameters, we propose a novel method to estimate energy parameters from both experimental and computational data, where the computational data are provided by a recently developed molecular dynamics simulation protocol. We evaluate our method for Watson-Crick stacked base pairs, and show that parameters estimated from 10 experimental data items and 10 computational data items can predict RNA secondary structures with accuracy comparable to that using conventional parameters. The results indicate that the combination of experimental free-energy measurements and molecular dynamics simulations is capable of estimating the thermodynamic properties of RNA secondary structures at lower cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available