4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

MeetingVis: Visual Narratives to Assist in Recalling Meeting Context and Content

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2816203

Keywords

Design study; information visualization; meeting summarization; natural language processing; visual narrative; voice recognition

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [22120180012]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [IIS-1528203, IIS-1320229]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402540, 61672538]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In team-based workplaces, reviewing and reflecting on the content from a previously held meeting can lead to better planning and preparation. However, ineffective meeting summaries can impair this process, especially when participants have difficulty remembering what was said and what its context was. To assist with this process, we introduce MeetingVis, a visual narrative-based approach to meeting summarization. MeetingVis is composed of two primary components: (1) a data pipeline that processes the spoken audio from a group discussion, and (2) a visual-based interface that efficiently displays the summarized content. To design MeetingVis, we create a taxonomy of relevant meeting data points, identifying salient elements to promote recall and reflection. These are mapped to an augmented storyline visualization, which combines the display of participant activities, topic evolutions, and task assignments. For evaluation, we conduct a qualitative user study with five groups. Feedback from the study indicates that MeetingVis effectively triggers the recall of subtle details from prior meetings: all study participants were able to remember new details, points, and tasks compared to an unaided, memory-only baseline. This visual-based approaches can also potentially enhance the productivity of both individuals and the whole team.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available