3.8 Proceedings Paper

A novel strategy to produce ultrapure hydrogen from coal with pre-combustion carbon capture

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.217

Keywords

IGCC; Ultrapure hydrogen; Cogeneration; Pressure swing adsorption; Process simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles (IGCCs) are one of the emerging clean coal technologies which paves the way for producing power from coal with a higher net power efficiency than conventional PC-fired boiler power plants. It is also advantageous that in an IGCC power plant a carbon capture unit can be applied to a stream having a very high CO2 partial pressure upstream of gas combustion that would not be available in case of a PC-fired boiler power plant, leading to less energy penalty involved in the carbon capture. In this study it is aimed to design a cogeneration process where a Hydrogen Pressure Swing Adsorption (H-2 PSA) unit is retrofitted to an IGCC power plant with pre-combustion capture for producing ultrapure hydrogen (99.99+ vol%). The ultrapure hydrogen is commonly utilised as feedstock for deep desulphurisation and hydrocracking units at refineries as well as H-2 fuel cells. It is found that, at the same H-2 purity of 99.99+%, the hydrogen recovery could be improved up to 93% with the increasing number of columns. Improving the H-2 recovery at the H-2 PSA to its maximum can contribute to reducing the power consumption for compressing the H-2 PSA tail gas by minimizing the yield of the H-2 PSA tail gas by-product. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the H-2 PSA can also be designed to achieve 90% H-2 recovery even when a portion of the tail gas is recycled to the shift reactors in order to improve the overall advanced IGCC performance by increasing the H-2 yield and by reducing the auxiliary power consumption at carbon capture unit. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available