4.8 Article

Model Predictive Control with Modulated Optimal Vector for a Three-Phase Inverter with an LC Filter

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 2690-2703

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2694049

Keywords

Finite control set (FCS); model predictive control (MPC); modulated optimal vector (MOV); space vector modulation (SVM); three-phase inverter

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea Government (MSIP, Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning) [2015R1A2A2A01003513]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A2A01003513, 22A20152213086] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an effective model predictive control (MPC) scheme using a modulated optimal vector (MOV) and finite control options for a three-phase inverter with an LC filter. Unlike other MPC methods, the proposed MPC strategy exploits the unconstrained optimal vector (OV) of the continuous-control-set (CCS) MPC to limit the control options for the unconstrained mode. First, the analytical OV is derived based on a least-squares optimization. If the input constraints are not violated, the OV is applied with a space vector modulation (SVM) technique like the CCS-MPC. Otherwise, the OV is scaled into the MOV and only three control options are online evaluated to reselect the control input. Experiments are conducted on a three-phase inverter test bed with a TI TMS320F28335 digital signal processor to validate the improvements of the proposed method, especially the robust performances and fast responses. The comparative results with the FCS-MPC show the superior performances of the proposed scheme with smaller steady-state error and lower total harmonic distortion due to the analytical OV with SVM, more robustness to parameter uncertainties due to the disturbance observer, and faster dynamic response due to the online reselection of control inputs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available