4.7 Article

Fusing Geometric Features for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition Using Multilayer LSTM Networks

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 2330-2343

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2018.2802648

Keywords

Action recognition; skeleton; geometric feature; LSTM; score fusion

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0203001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61572431]
  3. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LZ17F020001]
  4. Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province [2018C01006]
  5. ZJU
  6. Hikvision Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent skeleton-based action recognition approaches achieve great improvement by using recurrent neural network (RNN) models. Currently, these approaches build an end-to-end network from coordinates of joints to class categories and improve accuracy by extending RNN to spatial domains. First, while such well-designed models and optimization strategies explore relations between different parts directly from joint coordinates, we provide a simple universal spatial modeling method perpendicular to the RNN model enhancement. Specifically, according to the evolution of previous work, we select a set of simple geometric features, and then seperately feed each type of features to a three-layer LSTM framework. Second, we propose a multistream LSTM architecture with a new smoothed score fusion technique to learn classification from different geometric feature streams. Furthermore, we observe that the geometric relational features based on distances between joints and selected lines outperform other features and the fusion results achieve the state-of-the-art performance on four datasets. We also show the sparsity of input gate weights in the first LSTM layer trained by geometric features and demonstrate that utilizing joint-line distances as input require less data for training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available