4.7 Article

HuMAn: Complex Activity Recognition with Multi-Modal Multi-Positional Body Sensing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 857-870

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2018.2841905

Keywords

Complex activity recognition; smart health; smartphone multi-modal sensors; conditional random fields

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [IIS-1404673, IIP-1648907, IIP-1540119, IIS-1254117, II-New-1205695]
  2. Missouri University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current state-of-the-art systems in the literature using wearables are not capable of distinguishing a large number of fine-grained and/or complex human activities, which may appear similar but with vital differences in context, such as lying on floor versus lying on bed versus lying on sofa. This paper fills the gap by proposing a novel system, called HuMAn, that recognizes and classifies complex at-home activities of humans with wearable sensing. Specifically, HuMAn makes such classifications feasible by leveraging selective multi-modal sensor suites from wearable devices, and enhances the richness of sensed information for activity classification by carefully leveraging placement of the wearable devices across multiple positions on the human body. The HuMAn system consists of the following components: (a) a practical feature set extraction method from selected multi-modal sensor suites; and (b) a novel two-level structured classification algorithm that improves accuracy by leveraging sensors in multiple body positions; and (c) improved refinement in classification of complex activities with minimal external infrastructure support (e.g., only a few Bluetooth beacons used for location context). The proposed system is evaluated with 10 users in real home environments. Experimental results demonstrate that the HuMAn system can detect 21 complex at-home activities with high degree of accuracy. For same-user evaluation strategy, the average activity classification accuracy is as high as 95 percent over all of the 21 activities. For the case of 10-fold cross-validation evaluation strategy, the average classification accuracy is 92 percent, and for the case of leave-one-out cross-validation strategy, the average classification accuracy is 75 percent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available