4.7 Article

Data Quality Guided Incentive Mechanism Design for Crowdsensing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 307-319

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2017.2714668

Keywords

Crowdsensing; incentive mechanism; quality estimation; maximum likelihood estimation; information theory

Funding

  1. State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (973 project) [2014CB340303]
  2. China National Science Foundation [61672348, 61672353, 61422208, 61472252]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology fund [15220721300]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In crowdsensing, appropriate rewards are always expected to compensate the participants for their consumptions of physical resources and involvements of manual efforts. While continuous low quality sensing data could do harm to the availability and preciseness of crowdsensing based services, few existing incentive mechanisms have ever addressed the issue of data quality. The design of quality based incentive mechanism is motivated by its potential to avoid inefficient sensing and unnecessary rewards. In this paper, we incorporate the consideration of data quality into the design of incentive mechanism for crowdsensing, and propose to pay the participants as how well they do, to motivate the rational participants to efficiently perform crowdsensing tasks. This mechanism estimates the quality of sensing data, and offers each participant a reward based on her effective contribution. We also implement the mechanism and evaluate its improvement in terms of quality of service and profit of service provider. The evaluation results show that our mechanism achieves superior performance when compared to general data collection model and uniform pricing scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available