4.5 Article

Uplink-Downlink Duality for Integer-Forcing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 1992-2011

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2018.2791589

Keywords

MIMO; multiple access; broadcast; lattices; optimization

Funding

  1. NSF [CCF-1253918, CCF-1302600]
  2. S. and N. Grand Research Fund
  3. European Union [694630]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1253918, 1302600] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consider a Gaussian multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) multiple-access channel (MAC) with channel matrix H and a Gaussian MIMO broadcast channel (BC) with channel matrix HT. For the MIMO MAC, the integer-forcing architecture consists of first decoding integer-linear combinations of the transmitted codewords, which are then solved for the original messages. For the MIMO BC, the integer-forcing architecture consists of pre-inverting the integer-linear combinations at the transmitter, so that each receiver can obtain its desired codeword by decoding an integer-linear combination. In both the cases, integer-forcing offers higher achievable rates than zero-forcing while maintaining a similar implementation complexity. This paper establishes an uplink-downlink duality relationship for integer-forcing, i.e., any sum rate that is achievable via integer-forcing on the MIMO MAC can be achieved via integer-forcing on the MIMO BC with the same sum power and vice versa. Using this duality relationship, it is shown that integer-forcing can operate within a constant gap of the MIMO BC sum capacity. Finally, the paper proposes a duality-based iterative algorithm for the non-convex problem of selecting optimal beamforming and equalization vectors, and establishes that it converges to a local optimum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available